Venezuela has accused the United States of using “narco-terrorism” allegations as a political tool aimed at legitimising efforts to remove the government in Caracas. The claims, issued by senior officials on Monday, mark a sharp escalation in tensions and underline the increasingly fractured diplomatic landscape surrounding the country’s leadership.
Caracas dismisses charges as politically motivated
Venezuelan officials said the allegations — which accuse top members of the government of facilitating narcotics trafficking and collaborating with armed groups — are baseless and driven by Washington’s geopolitical objectives.
A government spokesperson argued that the US has repeatedly used legal accusations “to build a narrative of criminality” around the Venezuelan leadership, thereby creating international justification for external pressure and intervention.
Washington maintains its stance on criminal responsibility
US officials have previously defended the charges as proof of a long-standing pattern of illicit activity, insisting that the allegations are grounded in intelligence and international law-enforcement cooperation.
They argue that Venezuela’s security apparatus has enabled drug flows through the region, and that senior figures continue to engage with organisations Washington classifies as terrorist or criminal.
No additional comments were issued following the latest accusations, but the State Department is expected to address the matter later this week.
Diplomatic channels narrow as rhetoric intensifies
The renewed confrontation comes at a time when diplomatic avenues between the two countries remain limited. Informal talks pursued earlier this year yielded little progress, and both governments have since hardened their positions.
Regional observers say the latest dispute risks further destabilising Venezuela’s already fragile international standing, making it more difficult to negotiate sanctions relief or economic cooperation.
Regional reactions reflect diverging alliances
Several Latin American governments responded cautiously to the exchange. Countries aligned with Caracas criticised the US approach, arguing that criminal allegations should not be used as political instruments.
Others, including states with stronger ties to Washington, reiterated support for international efforts to curb drug trafficking but avoided endorsing the broader implications of regime change.
Domestic implications remain uncertain
Inside Venezuela, the government framed the US accusations as part of a wider campaign to undermine national sovereignty. State media outlets warned that Washington’s strategy could intensify economic pressure and disrupt ongoing domestic reform efforts.
Analysts note that while the political fallout may be significant, the immediate impact on the population depends on whether the dispute triggers new sanctions or diplomatic isolation.
Newshub Editorial in South America – 2025-11-25
Recent Comments