Politicians in at least 51 countries employed anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric during election campaigns over the past year, according to new research by a global rights organisation. The study highlights a growing trend of political figures using divisive language to mobilise support, while at the same time more openly gay, bisexual and transgender candidates are entering politics worldwide.
Widespread use of divisive language
The NGO found that political leaders and parties across regions including Europe, Africa, Asia and the Americas increasingly relied on rhetoric targeting LGBTQ+ communities during election cycles. The strategies ranged from questioning LGBTQ+ rights and marriage equality to portraying queer communities as threats to traditional or religious values. Researchers described this as a deliberate tactic aimed at energising conservative bases and diverting attention from economic and governance issues.
Regional variations in rhetoric
In Eastern Europe and parts of Africa, the rhetoric was often tied to nationalism and faith-based arguments. In Asia and Latin America, the framing focused on family values and social stability. Analysts pointed out that in several cases such narratives were amplified through social media campaigns, reinforcing polarisation ahead of the polls. While the intensity of the rhetoric varied, the NGO noted that the overall increase reflected a global pattern of exploiting cultural divisions for political gain.
A rise in LGBTQ+ political representation
Despite these challenges, the study identified a positive countertrend. In 36 countries, openly gay, bisexual or transgender candidates ran for political office in the same period. In some democracies, such candidates won seats in national or local legislatures, marking an important step towards visibility and representation. The report emphasised that this development could gradually reshape political discourse, challenging long-standing stereotypes and prejudices.
Implications for governance and society
Rights groups warn that anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric, even when unsuccessful in securing electoral victories, can foster long-term societal divisions and legitimise discrimination. The normalisation of such language risks undermining human rights protections, while also putting marginalised communities at greater risk of violence. Conversely, the increased presence of openly LGBTQ+ politicians may provide greater opportunities to influence policy in favour of equality and inclusion.
Looking ahead
The report urged governments, civil society organisations and international bodies to monitor political discourse and hold candidates accountable for harmful rhetoric. While the rise in LGBTQ+ representation offers reasons for optimism, the persistence of discriminatory narratives during election periods underscores the fragility of progress. Observers argue that how societies respond to this tension will help shape the future of democratic debate worldwide.
Newshub Editorial, 12 September 2025
Recent Comments