The deals mean CVS and Walgreens will pay more than $10bn for their roles in the opioid crisis that continues to claim thousands of lives in the US
Two US pharmacy chains have reached a tentative settlement over lawsuits brought by the state, local, and tribal governments accusing the companies of contributing to the opioid crisis through irresponsible practices.
CVS Health and Walgreens announced agreements on Wednesday under which they would pay about $5bn each, with Walmart also said to be in discussions for a deal that could add billions more to the total.
Paul Geller, one of the lawyers who negotiated for the governments, said that settlements with pharmacies “will bring billions of additional dollars to communities that are desperate for funds to combat the epidemic” of opioid addiction.
The opioid crisis has been connected to more than 699,000 deaths since 1999, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). And pharmaceutical drugmakers and distributors have faced a string of lawsuits over practices that critics say exacerbated and profited off of the crisis
The potential agreements could mark the last round of substantial settlements over the role of various corporations in the opioid crisis, with more than 3,300 lawsuits filed against drugmakers, distributors, and pharmacies since 2017.
Lawsuits against CVS, Walgreens and Walmart alleged that the companies filled prescriptions even when red flags appeared that their opioids were being diverted into illegal activities.
CVS stated on Wednesday that it had agreed to pay $5bn over a 10-year period, and Walgreens said that it had agreed to pay $5.7bn over a 15-year period, per a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), seen by the Reuters news agency.
CVS general counsel Thomas Moriarty said in a statement that the deal was “in the best interest of all parties, as well as our customers, colleagues and shareholders”.
Neither company admitted wrongdoing, and Walgreens warned that it had “strong legal defences” that would be used against any future lawsuits.
Both noted that their agreements would not be final until certain non-monetary terms were finalised and that the total amount could be reduced if not enough government plaintiffs sign on.
Source: Aljazeera
Recent Comments